Lanford v. Commerce Acceptance Co.

1965 OK 196, 409 P.2d 7, 1965 Okla. LEXIS 483
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 21, 1965
DocketNo. 40972
StatusPublished

This text of 1965 OK 196 (Lanford v. Commerce Acceptance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lanford v. Commerce Acceptance Co., 1965 OK 196, 409 P.2d 7, 1965 Okla. LEXIS 483 (Okla. 1965).

Opinion

HALLEY, Chief Justice:

Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. The sole question involved in this appeal is the correctness of the ruling the trial court in dismissing the appeal of the defendants from a judgment entered in a justice of the peace court because of their failure to file an appeal bond in the justice court within a period of ten days after judgment was entered as required in § 242, Title 39, O.S.1961.

The judgment was entered in the justice court on December 20, 1963. The appeal bond was filed on December 31, 1963, or one day late.

The Oklahoma Court in Goodin v. Japp, 149 Okl. 271, 300 P. 683 held:

“An appeal from a justice court to the county court must be taken within ten days, and the appeal bond must be filed within that time. If the bond is not filed within that time, the appellate court acquires no jurisdiction and the appeal is properly dismissed.”

Other cases to the same effect are: Maryland Casualty Co. v. Cowan, 18S Okl. 304, 91 P.2d 756; Price v. Price, 73 Okl. 178, 175 P. 343; Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. O’Neal, 52 Okl. 527, 152 P. 1071; Washburn v. Delaney, 30 Okl. 789, 120 P. 620; Vowell v. Taylor, 8 Okl. 625, 58 P. 944; Brickner v. Sporleder, 3 Okl. 561, 41 P. 726; Bubb v. Cain, 37 Kan. 692, 16 P. 89; Struber v. Rohlfs, 36 Kan. 202, 12 P. 830.

Appeals from the justice court are purely statutory and strict compliance with the statutory provisions is required. Price v. Price, supra; Washburn v. Delaney, supra.

The trial court correctly sustained the motion to dismiss the appeal from the justice court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Price v. Price
1918 OK 566 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
Brickner v. Sporleder
1895 OK 63 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1895)
Goodin v. Japp
1931 OK 221 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
Vowell v. Taylor
1899 OK 84 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1899)
Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. O'Neal
1915 OK 855 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Cowan
1939 OK 292 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1939)
Washburn v. Delaney
1911 OK 522 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Struber v. Rohlfs
36 Kan. 202 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1887)
Bubb v. Cain
37 Kan. 692 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1965 OK 196, 409 P.2d 7, 1965 Okla. LEXIS 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanford-v-commerce-acceptance-co-okla-1965.