Laney v. Stewart

35 Ga. 251
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1866
StatusPublished

This text of 35 Ga. 251 (Laney v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laney v. Stewart, 35 Ga. 251 (Ga. 1866).

Opinion

Harris, J.

Upon the return of commissioners appointed to lay off and assign dower to Mrs. Stewart, formerly the widow of Chappell Cox, deceased, a traverse thereof, denying its fairness and that it was in accordance with law., was filed by the administrators of Chappell Cox and his heirs at law. When the case was called for trial, the applicants for dower moved to strike from the pleadings the names of the heirs at law as parties to the proceeding, denying their right to [252]*252be heard in contesting the claim oí applicants. The Court below sustained the motion, and this decision constitutes the error assigned.

This case furnishes a striking illustration of a statute on this subject having been forgotten, or having escaped the attention of the counsel and of the Court; we mean the Act of 1863, which allows all persons interested to contest the returns of commissioners.

Let the judgment be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Ga. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laney-v-stewart-ga-1866.