Lane v. United States

83 F. Supp. 260, 37 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1279, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3105
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri
DecidedNovember 30, 1948
DocketNo. 4501, Div. No. 1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 83 F. Supp. 260 (Lane v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lane v. United States, 83 F. Supp. 260, 37 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1279, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3105 (E.D. Mo. 1948).

Opinion

MOORE, Chief Judge.

The Court makes the following findings of fact:

Count One

1. Plaintiffs are the duly appointed and acting cotrustees under the will of Sarah L. G. Wilson, deceased. A true and correct copy of said will, together with all codicils thereto, is attached to these findings, marked “Exhibit 1”, and expressly made a part of these findings. Sarah L. G. Wilson died on November 19, 1938, a resident of St. Louis County, Missouri.

2. The amount in 'controversy herein does not exceed Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00).

3. As residuary legatees under the will of Sarah L. G. Wilson, deceased, plaintiffs during the calendar year 1939 held assets received by them from the executors of the estate of said deceased, together and as a whole; such assets were undivided and were held by plaintiffs for the benefit of the parties named in Section VIII of the will of said decedent in accordance with the provisions of said will and the codicils thereto.

4. On or about February 27, 1940, plaintiffs filed with the Collector of Internal Revenue at St. Louis, Missouri, for the calendar year 1939 a single fiduciary income tax return on Form 1041, reporting the income received and the expenses incurred in their administration of the assets in their hands, as set forth in Paragraph 3 hereof, and the amount of such income distributed to the beneficiaries and on March 2, 1940, paid a tax in the amount of Two Hundred Thirty-Nine Dollars and Four Cents ($239.04) on the undistributed amount of such income.

5. In December, 1942 and within three years after the filing of plaintiffs’ said return, plaintiffs and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue agreed in writing under the provisions of Section 276(b), I.R.C., 26 U.S.C.A. § 276(b), to extend to June 30, 1944, being beyond the period prescribed in Section 275, I.R.C., 26 U.S.C.A. § 275, the time within which the Commissioner might make an assessment against plaintiffs of income taxes for the calendar year 1939.

6. An audit was made of plaintiffs’ said return by the Bureau of Internal Revenue, and on June 13, 1944, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue sent to plaintiffs a ninety-day letter in accordance with the provisions of Section 272(a), I.R.C., 26 U.S.C.A. § 272(a), notifying plaintiffs of a deficiency tax of Four Hundred Four [261]*261Dollars and Forty-One Cents ($404.41), which was paid by plaintiffs to the Collector of Internal Revenue for the First District of Missouri on June 23, 1944, together with the sum of One Hundred Three Dollars and Fifty-nine Cents ($103.-59), representing interest at the rate of 6% per annum on said deficiency tax from March 15, 1940 to said date of payment. The assessment of said deficiency tax was due to the increase of plaintiffs’ undistributed net income from the amount of Five Thousand One Hundred Eighty-Eight Dollars and Three Cents ($5,188.03) as shown on the return filed by plaintiffs to the amount of Nine Thousand Five Hundred Seventy-three Dollars and Ninety-four Cents ($9,573.94). In computing said deficiency tax the Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined that there was only one trust created by Section VIII of the last will and testament of Sarah L. G. Wilson, deceased.

7. On July 26, 1944, plaintiffs filed with the Collector of Internal Revenue for the First District of Missouri their claim for refund of Three Hundred Seventy-two Dollars and thirty cents ($372.30) of the aforesaid income taxes paid by them for the calendar year 1939.

8. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3772(a) (2) I.R.C., 26 U.S.C.A. § 3772(a) (2), the Commissioner of Internal Revenue notified plaintiffs by letter dated August 22, 1945, that said claim for refund had been disallowed in full.

9. At the time of the death of Sarah L. G. Wilson, the eight nephews and nieces named in Section VIII of her last will and •testament were all living and were then of the following ages respectively:

William G. B. Carson 47
Eleanor G. Conant 51
Mary Glasgow Chivvis 51
Ellen Glasgow Lane 46
Carr Lane Glasgow 57
F. Ewing Glasgow 48
Charles M. Glasgow 53
Sarah B. Jones 65

The first four above named each had living issue at the date of Mrs. Wilson’s death and at the present time;' the last four named had no issue at such time and still have none.

10. During the year 1939 plaintiffs distributed identical amounts to each of the eight parties named in Section VIII of said last will and testament.

11. During the year 1939 plaintiffs were engaged in gathering assets received from the executors of Mrs. Wilson’s estate.

12. There were eight separate trusts created and established by the residuary section ■ (Section VIII) of Mrs. Wilson’s will, one such trust for each of the decedent’s eight nephews and nieces named in Paragraph 9 of these findings.

Count Two

13. Plaintiffs are the duly appointed and acting cotrustees under the will of Sarah L. G. Wilson, deceased. A true and correct copy of said will, together with all codicils thereto, is attached to these findings, Marked “Exhibit 1”, and expressly made a part of these findings. Sarah L. G. Wilson died on November 19, 1938 a resident of St. Louis County, Missouri.

14. The amount in controversy herein does not exceed Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00).

15. As residuary legatees under the will of Sarah L. G. Wilson, deceased, plaintiffs, during the calendar year 1940, held assets received by them from the executors of the estate of said deceased, together and as a whole; such assets were undivided and were held by the plaintiffs for the benefit of the parties named in Section VIII of the will of said decedent, in accordance with the provisions of said will and the codicils thereto.

16. Out of the net income of the assets held by plaintiffs as set forth in Paragraph 15 hereof, plaintiffs paid during the calendar year 1940 to each of the parties named in Section VIII of the will of Sarah L. G. Wilson, deceased, except Charles M. Glasgow, the sum of Thirteen Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars ($13,750.00), and to Charles M. Glasgow the sum of Five Thousand Seven Hundred Eight Dollars and Seventy-eight Cents ($5,708.78).

[262]*26217. On or about March 12, 1941 plaintiffs filed with the Collector of Internal Revenue at St. Louis, Missouri, the following separate returns reporting the income, expenses and payments in their administration of the properties mentioned in Paragraph 15 hereof:

(a) Seven separate fiduciary income-tax returns on Form 1041 for the calendar year 1940, in one of which plaintiffs designated themselves as cotrustees for William G. B. Carson, in one of which plaintiffs designated themselves as cotrustees for Eleanor G. Conant, in one of which plaintiffs designated themselves as cotrustees for Mary Glasgow Chivvis, in one of which plaintiffs designated themselves as cotrus-tees for Ellen Glasgow Lane, in one of which plaintiffs designated themselves as cotrustees for Carr Lane Glasgow, in one of which plaintiffs designated themselves as cotrustees for F. Ewing Glasgow, in one of which plaintiffs designated themselves as cotrustees for Sarah B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hemphill v. Aukamp
264 S.E.2d 163 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1980)
Rand Trust v. Commissioner
1960 T.C. Memo. 216 (U.S. Tax Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 F. Supp. 260, 37 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1279, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-united-states-moed-1948.