Lane v. State
236 S.W. 1118, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 770
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lane v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 Tex. Crim. 140 →
Opinion
The conviction is for robbery. There is neither statement of facts nor bill of exceptions. The indictment is regular; no fundamental error is revealed. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lane v. State, 236 S.W. 1118, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 770 (Tex. 1922).
236 S.W. 1118 (Lane v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.