Lane v. State
156 S.W. 204
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lane v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 Tex. Crim. 65 →
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law; his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement- in the penitentiary.
The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The only ground of the motion for new trial is that the evidence does not justify or warrant the conviction. Inasmuch as the testimony is not before us, we are unable to revise this matter.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lane v. State, 156 S.W. 204 (Tex. 1913).
156 S.W. 204 (Lane v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.