Lane v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Lane v. State

1920 OK CR 205, 192 P. 1104, 18 Okla. Crim. 708, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 187

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 12, 1920

DocketNo. A-3578.

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 205 (Lane v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lane v. State, 1920 OK CR 205, 192 P. 1104, 18 Okla. Crim. 708, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 187 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CU'RIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Lex Lane, was convicted on an information charging that he did have possession of 25 half pints of whisky with the unlawful intention of selling the same. An the 3d day of May, 1919, judgment was rendered, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, and he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and pay a fine of $50. From the judgment, he ap(-peals.

No brief has been filed, and, when the case was called for final submission, no appearance was made on behalf of plaintiff in error. Thereupon the Attorney General moved the court to affirm the judgment. A cursory examination of the record discloses there is no merit whatever in the various errors assigned.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CU'RIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Lex Lane, was convicted on an information charging that he did have possession of 25 half pints of whisky with the unlawful intention of selling the same. An the 3d day of May, 1919, judgment was rendered, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, and he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and pay a fine of $50. From the judgment, he ap(-peals.

No brief has been filed, and, when the case was called for final submission, no appearance was made on behalf of plaintiff in error. Thereupon the Attorney General moved the court to affirm the judgment. A cursory examination of the record discloses there is no merit whatever in the various errors assigned.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 205, 192 P. 1104, 18 Okla. Crim. 708, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.