Lane v. State
This text of 265 A.D. 890 (Lane v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court’s finding that claimant is entitled to consequential damages is hereby allowed because of loss of view occasioned by the twenty-two foot embankment and by the further fact that the embankment is unsightly. Findings made by the trial judge that an award should be made because of increased cost of installing a siding are reversed. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 A.D. 890, 37 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-state-nyappdiv-1942.