Lane v. State
265 A.D. 890, 37 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6359
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 11, 1942·No. Claim No. 26120·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The court’s finding that claimant is entitled to consequential damages is hereby allowed because of loss of view occasioned by the twenty-two foot embankment and by the further fact that the embankment is unsightly. Findings made by the trial judge that an award should be made because of increased cost of installing a siding are reversed. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lane v. State, 265 A.D. 890, 37 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6359 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
265 A.D. 890 (Lane v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Purchase Hills Realty Associates v. State
35 A.D.2d 78 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)
Dennison v. State
48 Misc. 2d 778 (New York State Court of Claims, 1965)
Keinz v. State
2 A.D.2d 415 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)