Lane v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lane v. State

485 S.W.3d 402, 2016 WL 1317930, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 327

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 5, 2016·No. WD 78682·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Mr. William Lane appeals the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion pleading ineffective assistance of counsel because trial counsel failed to object to the victim’s out-of-court videotaped statements and failed to require the victim to testify which waived Mr. Lane’s right to confrontation. We disagree.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Mr. William Lane appeals the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion pleading ineffective assistance of counsel because trial counsel failed to object to the victim’s out-of-court videotaped statements and failed to require the victim to testify which waived Mr. Lane’s right to confrontation. We disagree.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Lane v. State, 485 S.W.3d 402, 2016 WL 1317930, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 327 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

485 S.W.3d 402 (Lane v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.