Lane v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lane v. State

485 S.W.3d 402, 2016 WL 1317930, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 327

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 5, 2016

DocketWD 78682

StatusPublished

This text of 485 S.W.3d 402 (Lane v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lane v. State, 485 S.W.3d 402, 2016 WL 1317930, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 327 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Mr. William Lane appeals the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion pleading ineffective assistance of counsel because trial counsel failed to object to the victim’s out-of-court videotaped statements and failed to require the victim to testify which waived Mr. Lane’s right to confrontation. We disagree.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Mr. William Lane appeals the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion pleading ineffective assistance of counsel because trial counsel failed to object to the victim’s out-of-court videotaped statements and failed to require the victim to testify which waived Mr. Lane’s right to confrontation. We disagree.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

485 S.W.3d 402, 2016 WL 1317930, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-state-moctapp-2016.