Lane v. State
710 S.W.2d 354, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3925
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals from the denial without a hearing of his Rule 27.26 motion which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel at a probation revocation hearing. A Rule 27.26 motion is not the proper procedure by which to challenge the effectiveness of [355] counsel at a probation revocation hearing, The state’s motion to dismiss the appeal is denied as moot. No precedential purpose would be served by a written opinion.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lane v. State, 710 S.W.2d 354, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3925 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986).
710 S.W.2d 354 (Lane v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wood v. State
853 S.W.2d 369 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993)
Clark v. State
736 S.W.2d 483 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1987)