Lane v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lane v. State

710 S.W.2d 354, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3925

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 1, 1986

DocketNo. 50419

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 710 S.W.2d 354 (Lane v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lane v. State, 710 S.W.2d 354, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3925 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial without a hearing of his Rule 27.26 motion which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel at a probation revocation hearing. A Rule 27.26 motion is not the proper procedure by which to challenge the effectiveness of [355]*355counsel at a probation revocation hearing, The state’s motion to dismiss the appeal is denied as moot. No precedential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial without a hearing of his Rule 27.26 motion which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel at a probation revocation hearing. A Rule 27.26 motion is not the proper procedure by which to challenge the effectiveness of [355]*355counsel at a probation revocation hearing, The state’s motion to dismiss the appeal is denied as moot. No precedential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

710 S.W.2d 354, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-state-moctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack