Lane v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Lane v. State

225 S.E.2d 79, 137 Ga. App. 692, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2575

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 17, 1976

Docket51828

StatusPublished

This text of 225 S.E.2d 79 (Lane v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lane v. State, 225 S.E.2d 79, 137 Ga. App. 692, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2575 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Evans, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of burglary and aggravated assault, and sentenced to serve nine years on each charge, [693]*693the sentences to run concurrently. Motion for new trial was denied, and defendant appeals. Held:

Submitted February 3, 1976 Decided February 17, 1976. King, Phipps & Associates, Herbert E. Phipps, for appellant. William S. Lee, District Attorney, Loring A. Gray, Jr., Daniel MacDougald, III, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

1. A building was burglarized. The owner found the defendant in a back room of the building. Defendant was armed. A struggle ensued and defendant was subdued and arrested. Items of personal property belonging to the wife of the building owner (and which had been left in the building) were found on his person when searched.

The evidence was ample to support the verdict of conviction of burglary. See Code § 26-1601; Bridges v. State, 123 Ga. App. 157 (179 SE2d 685).

2. Defendant makes no argument as to the charge of aggravated assault, but he only argues the issue of whether or not the evidence was sufficient to support the charge of burglary.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI