Lane v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Lane v. State

95 S.E. 537, 22 Ga. App. 133, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 194

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 2, 1918

Docket9529

StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 537 (Lane v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lane v. State, 95 S.E. 537, 22 Ga. App. 133, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 194 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Bbotles, P. J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence was purely cumulative, and the court did not err in overruling the grounds .of the motion for a new trial based thereon.

2. There was some evidence which authorized the defendant’s conviction,, and, the verdict having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Sarwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bbotles, P. J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence was purely cumulative, and the court did not err in overruling the grounds .of the motion for a new trial based thereon.

2. There was some evidence which authorized the defendant’s conviction,, and, the verdict having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Sarwell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 S.E. 537, 22 Ga. App. 133, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-state-gactapp-1918.