Lane v. State

603 So. 2d 510, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 582, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1564, 1992 WL 212015
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 3, 1992·No. No. 78534·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Upon the authority of Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992), we quash State v. [511]*511Lane, 582 So.2d 77 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), and remand with directions to reinstate Lane’s community control and probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur. GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion, in which HARDING, J., concurs. McDONALD, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lane v. State, 603 So. 2d 510, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 582, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1564, 1992 WL 212015 (Fla. 1992).

603 So. 2d 510 (Lane v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McKendry
614 So. 2d 1158 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)