Lane v. Sochacki
This text of 279 A.D. 595 (Lane v. Sochacki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ho opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ., concur; Adel and Wenzel, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to deny the motion, with the following memorandum: The papers fail to include competent or sufficient evidence to warrant granting the application or to excuse the delay in making it. (See Kenney v. South Shore Natural Gas & Fuel Co., 126 App. Div. 236.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D. 595, 107 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-sochacki-nyappdiv-1951.