Lane v. Sochacki
279 A.D. 595, 107 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3131
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 8, 1951·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Ho opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ., concur; Adel and Wenzel, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to deny the motion, with the following memorandum: The papers fail to include competent or sufficient evidence to warrant granting the application or to excuse the delay in making it. (See Kenney v. South Shore Natural Gas & Fuel Co., 126 App. Div. 236.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lane v. Sochacki, 279 A.D. 595, 107 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
279 A.D. 595 (Lane v. Sochacki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
De Filippo v. City of Schenectady
21 A.D.2d 947 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Burden v. Cadillac Developers Massapequa Corp.
34 Misc. 2d 37 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Nathanson v. Lutheran Hospital Ass'n
3 Misc. 2d 540 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)