Lane v. . New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.
81 N.E. 1180, 188 N.Y. 613, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 1284
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of McGoy v. FT. 7. G. db II. R. R. R. Go. (185 N. Y. 276); no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, ■ W erner and W illard Bartlett, JJ. Not sitting: Gray, J. Absent: Hiscock, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lane v. . New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co., 81 N.E. 1180, 188 N.Y. 613, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 1284 (N.Y. 1907).
81 N.E. 1180 (Lane v. . New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCoy v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
77 N.E. 1174 (New York Court of Appeals, 1906)