Lane v. . Morton

78 N.C. 7
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lane v. . Morton. Read the opinion of the Court — 81 N.C. 38
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1878·Published

Opinion

The only question is, Did the judge have the power to allow the answer to be filed? In Hinton v. Deans, 75 N.C. 18, the defendant applied to his Honor to be allowed to add the plea of the statute of limitations, and we decided that it was discretionary and not a matter of right in the defendant.

In Heyer v. Beatty, 76 N.C. 28, we held that the defendant ought to be allowed to amend his answer and make it what he intended it to be before the justice, and that decision governs the present (8) case, which involves the same question.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

Cited: Lane v. Morton, 81 N.C. 38. *Page 6

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lane v. . Morton, 78 N.C. 7 (N.C. 1878).

78 N.C. 7 (Lane v. . Morton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heyer v. . Beatty
76 N.C. 28 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1877)
Hinton v. . Deans
75 N.C. 18 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1876)
Lane v. . Morton
81 N.C. 38 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1879)