Lane v. Morrison
This text of 183 S.E.2d 533 (Lane v. Morrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants received adverse judgments in the superior court on the issue of valuation of their respective real property for taxation. See Code § 92-6912, as amended.
1. In each case the appellant enumerates as error an identical instruction to the jury. The record does not reflect that either made any objection or exception before the jury returned its verdict as required by Code Ann. § 70-207 (a). Therefore, nothing is presented for consideration by these enumerations. John [317]*317L. Hutcheson &c. Hospital v. Oliver, 120 Ga. App. 547 (3) (171 SE2d 649).
2. In case No. 46338, the trial court refused to allow certain documentary evidence offered by the appellant. This evidence contained the valuation placed upon property of another situated near the appellant’s property. The appellant’s counsel admitted at the time of tender that no showing had been made that the property covered by the exhibit was in any way similar to appellant’s land. Thus, the evidence was not relevant and was properly excluded. Code § 38-201.
Judgments affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
183 S.E.2d 533, 124 Ga. App. 316, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-morrison-gactapp-1971.