Lane v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Federal Circuit

Lane v. Merit Systems Protection Board

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 19, 2011

Docket19-1674

StatusUnpublished

This text of Lane v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Lane v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lane v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential , United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ALBERTA LANE, Petitioner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,\ Respondent. 2010-3191 ¢ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection B0ard in case no. DA531D100290»I-1. ON MOTION ORDER 'I‘he Department of Homeland Security moves to re- form the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Pr0t;ection Board as the respondent We note that Alberta Lane has not timely filed a `l:)rief. Accordingly, IT ls ORDERED THAT:

LANE V. MSPB 2 (1) The motion is granted The revised official cap- tion is reflected above. (2) The petition for review is dismissed for failure to file a brief FOR THE CoURT 1 9 fsi Jan H0rbaly Date J an Horbaly C1erk cc: A1berta Lane Antonia R. Soares, Esq. Michael Carney, Esq. s2O IssUED As A MANDA'rE; JAN 19 2911 U.S. COUR`FE)lI:`£All’)PEALS FOR THE FEDER.l'J. ClRCU|T JAN 19 2011 lAN |'lBRBALY CLERK §

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential , United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ALBERTA LANE, Petitioner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,\ Respondent. 2010-3191 ¢ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection B0ard in case no. DA531D100290»I-1. ON MOTION ORDER 'I‘he Department of Homeland Security moves to re- form the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Pr0t;ection Board as the respondent We note that Alberta Lane has not timely filed a `l:)rief. Accordingly, IT ls ORDERED THAT:

LANE V. MSPB 2 (1) The motion is granted The revised official cap- tion is reflected above. (2) The petition for review is dismissed for failure to file a brief FOR THE CoURT 1 9 fsi Jan H0rbaly Date J an Horbaly C1erk cc: A1berta Lane Antonia R. Soares, Esq. Michael Carney, Esq. s2O IssUED As A MANDA'rE; JAN 19 2911 U.S. COUR`FE)lI:`£All’)PEALS FOR THE FEDER.l'J. ClRCU|T JAN 19 2011 lAN |'lBRBALY CLERK §

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Lane v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2011.