Lane v. Lyons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lane v. Lyons

300 A.D.2d 363, 751 N.Y.S.2d 758, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11924

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 300 A.D.2d 363 (Lane v. Lyons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lane v. Lyons, 300 A.D.2d 363, 751 N.Y.S.2d 758, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering and wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Williams, J.), dated September 28, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant Orange County Publications, Division of Ottaway Newspapers, Inc., doing business as Times Herald Record and against him, in effect, dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against that defendant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that for a court to conclude that a jury verdict is unsupported “by sufficient evidence as a matter of law, there must be ‘no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could possibly lead rational men to the conclusion reached by the jury on the basis of the evidence presented at trial’ ” (Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 132, quoting Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499). Moreover, a jury verdict in favor of a defendant should not be set aside as against the weight of the evidence and a new trial ordered unless “the jury could not have reached the verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence” (Nicastro v Park, supra at 134). In this case, there is no basis to overturn the verdict (see Hershkowitz v Saint Michel, 143 AD2d 809; Nicastro v Park, supra). Ritter, J.P., Florio, S. Miller and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering and wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Williams, J.), dated September 28, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant Orange County Publications, Division of Ottaway Newspapers, Inc., doing business as Times Herald Record and against him, in effect, dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against that defendant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that for a court to conclude that a jury verdict is unsupported “by sufficient evidence as a matter of law, there must be ‘no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could possibly lead rational men to the conclusion reached by the jury on the basis of the evidence presented at trial’ ” (Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 132, quoting Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499). Moreover, a jury verdict in favor of a defendant should not be set aside as against the weight of the evidence and a new trial ordered unless “the jury could not have reached the verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence” (Nicastro v Park, supra at 134). In this case, there is no basis to overturn the verdict (see Hershkowitz v Saint Michel, 143 AD2d 809; Nicastro v Park, supra). Ritter, J.P., Florio, S. Miller and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 A.D.2d 363, 751 N.Y.S.2d 758, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-lyons-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack