Lane v. Lane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lane v. Lane

48 A.D.2d 929, 372 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10210

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.2d 929 (Lane v. Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lane v. Lane, 48 A.D.2d 929, 372 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10210 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In a support proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the parties cross-appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated January 21, 1975, as follows: (1) the husband appeals [930]*930from the whole of said order which inter alia fixed support payments for petitioner at $400 per week and for their minor child at $150 per week; and (2) petitioner, as limited by her brief, appeals from so much of the order as limited the support payments to herself and the child to the aforesaid amounts. Order modified, on the facts, by reducing the amounts fixed therein for the support of petitioner and of the child to $350 per week and $100 per week, respectively. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the awards for alimony and child support were excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a support proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the parties cross-appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated January 21, 1975, as follows: (1) the husband appeals [930]*930from the whole of said order which inter alia fixed support payments for petitioner at $400 per week and for their minor child at $150 per week; and (2) petitioner, as limited by her brief, appeals from so much of the order as limited the support payments to herself and the child to the aforesaid amounts. Order modified, on the facts, by reducing the amounts fixed therein for the support of petitioner and of the child to $350 per week and $100 per week, respectively. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the awards for alimony and child support were excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 929, 372 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-lane-nyappdiv-1975.