Lane v. Lane-Jordan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lane v. Lane-Jordan

419 S.W.3d 882, 2013 WL 6236710, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1408

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 26, 2013·No. Nos. ED 99122, ED 99131·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Georgetown Mortgage Profit Sharing Trust appeals the trial court’s judgment, entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Susan Lane for wrongful foreclosure. Lane cross-appeals, contending the trial [883] court erred in refusing to award her prejudgment interest.

The evidence sufficiently supports the jury’s verdict. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Georgetown Mortgage Profit Sharing Trust appeals the trial court’s judgment, entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Susan Lane for wrongful foreclosure. Lane cross-appeals, contending the trial [883] court erred in refusing to award her prejudgment interest.

The evidence sufficiently supports the jury’s verdict. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Lane v. Lane-Jordan, 419 S.W.3d 882, 2013 WL 6236710, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1408 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

419 S.W.3d 882 (Lane v. Lane-Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.