Lane v. Lane

24 N.W. 601, 67 Iowa 76
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided September 26, 1885·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Beck, Oh. J.

The plaintiff has not appealed, and the case therefore cannot be reviewed as it is presented by her petition and evidence. The defendant asks for the divorce in his cross-hill on the ground of desertion by the plaintiff. We think the desertion is established. The parties were married in 1880, and lived together but a few months, when plaintiff left her husband, and did not again return. The defendant is above seventy years of age, and the plaintiff is more than sixty. It appears, that there is no affection between them, and each is desirous of separating from the other. The law [77] affords them an avenue of escape from the marriage relations through the desertion of the wife, which is satisfactorily established. The decision of the district court is reversed, and the cause will be remanded for a decree in harmony with this opinion.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lane v. Lane, 24 N.W. 601, 67 Iowa 76 (iowa 1885).

24 N.W. 601 (Lane v. Lane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bennett v. Bennett
144 N.W.2d 328 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1966)
Bunger v. Bunger
90 N.W.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1958)
Taylor v. Taylor
45 N.W. 307 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1890)