Lane v. Ivy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Lane v. Ivy

74 S.E. 782, 138 Ga. 120, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 217

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 13, 1912

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 S.E. 782 (Lane v. Ivy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lane v. Ivy, 74 S.E. 782, 138 Ga. 120, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 217 (Ga. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

“The first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by the Supreme Court, unless the plaintiff in error shows that the judge abused his discretion in granting it, and that the law and facts require the verdict notwithstanding the judgment of the presiding judge.” Civil. Code, § 6204. In this case it does not appear that the law and facts required the verdict, nor that the judge abused his discretion in granting a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fish, C. J.

“The first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by the Supreme Court, unless the plaintiff in error shows that the judge abused his discretion in granting it, and that the law and facts require the verdict notwithstanding the judgment of the presiding judge.” Civil. Code, § 6204. In this case it does not appear that the law and facts required the verdict, nor that the judge abused his discretion in granting a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 S.E. 782, 138 Ga. 120, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-ivy-ga-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack