Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lane v. FLORIDA PROBATION COM'N

Lane v. FLORIDA PROBATION COM'N

894 So. 2d 1087, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2921, 2005 WL 525567
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 8, 2005·No. 1D04-2654·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

894 So.2d 1087 (2005)

Rayfield LANE, Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA PROBATION COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 1D04-2654.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 8, 2005.

Rayfield Lane, pro se, petitioner.

Kim M. Fluharty, General Counsel, and Susan Schwartz, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Because the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed below set forth a prima facie basis for relief, the circuit court erred in summarily denying the petition without issuing an order to show cause. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.630(d). Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari, quash the circuit court's order and remand this cause for further proceedings.

WEBSTER, PADOVANO and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lane v. FLORIDA PROBATION COM'N, 894 So. 2d 1087, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2921, 2005 WL 525567 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

894 So. 2d 1087 (Lane v. FLORIDA PROBATION COM'N) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bluntson v. Florida Parole Commission
910 So. 2d 896 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)