Lane v. Felt

73 Mass. 491
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1856
StatusPublished

This text of 73 Mass. 491 (Lane v. Felt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lane v. Felt, 73 Mass. 491 (Mass. 1856).

Opinion

Shaw, C. J.

All that appears affirmatively by the answer oí the original trustee, since deceased, is, that he had received from another person a check on a bank, with authority to collect the amount of it, and pay it to the principal defendant upon conditions named. Various interrogatories were put to the trustee in his lifetime, by the answers to which it appeared that before the service of the process said conditions had been complied with, and the trustee had offered to pay to the principal defendant so much of said amount as was not attached by this process, but that he had not paid any part of it. He was not asked whether he had received the money on the check; and from his answer that he had received a check, and nothing further, the presumption of fact certainly is, that he held the check at the time of the last service, as well as the first.

A check is not attachable property; it is only a means of receiving money, which may never be paid. In order to charge a trustee, it must appear, either that he is a debtor to the principal, or that he holds some chattel or specific article, which may be turned out to the sheriff, when he comes with the execution, to be sold by him, or applied according to law to the satisfaction of the judgment. If his liability depended upon the fact that the trustee had received the money, and thus become debtor to the principal defendant, the plaintiff should nave put the question to him directly. The executrix of the trustee denies any knowledge on the subject, or any information from her husband, the trustee.

It was said in the argument, that it is the duty of the trustee to. discharge himself by his answer. This is true, when he ad[492]*492mits enough in his answer to charge him, but for some matter of avoidance relied upon. Then it is incumbent on him to establish the matter in avoidance. Trustee discharged.

G. Lamson, for the plaintiff,

cited Haskell v. Haskell, 8 Met. 545; Carley v. Vance, 17 Mass. 391; Shaw v. Bunker, 2 Met. 376.

S. B. Ives, Jr. for the trustee,

cited Maine Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Weeks, 7 Mass. 438; Perry v. Coates, 9 Mass. 537; Meacham v. McCorbitt, 2 Met. 352; Mayhew v. Scott, 10 Pick. 54; Dwight v. Bank of Michigan, 10 Met. 58 ; Stone v. Dean, 5 N. H. 502; Clark v. Viles, 32 Maine, 32; Hemmenway v. Pratt, 23 Verm. 332 ; Porter v. Stevens, 9 Cush. 530.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maine Fire & Marine Insurance v. Weeks
7 Mass. 438 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1811)
Perry v. Coates
9 Mass. 537 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1813)
Hemmenway v. Pratt
23 Vt. 332 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1851)
Cypress Pond Draining Co. v. Hooper
59 Ky. 350 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1859)
Commonwealth v. McCready
59 Ky. 376 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1859)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 Mass. 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-felt-mass-1856.