Lane v. Farmer
8 Ark. 63
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Proof of execution of the order in question wras an indispensable pre-requisite to its being read in evidence. Had this been done, then its possession by the debtor on whom it was drawn, was •prima facie evidence that he had paid it according to its tenor. (2 Greenl. Ev., p. 492, sec. 518.)
The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lane v. Farmer, 8 Ark. 63 (Ark. 1852).
8 Ark. 63 (Lane v. Farmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Second Nat. Bank of Toledo v. M. Samuel & Sons, Inc.
12 F.2d 963 (Second Circuit, 1926)
Teter v. Teter
63 S.E. 967 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1909)