Lane v. Fallen

16 Md. 352, 1860 Md. LEXIS 72
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided July 11, 1860·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Eccleston, J.,

delivered the opinion of this court.

The clepree appealed from dismissed the bill, upon the [357] ground, that the judgment presented in defence is a proper set-off against the claim of the complainants. Believing, as we do, that the circumstances disclosed by the record are ¡sufficient to sustain the decision below, the decree will be affirmed. See Smith & Talbott vs. Donnell, 9 Gill, 89. Ferris, et al., vs. Burton, 1 Vermont Rep., 439, 455.

(Decided July 11th, 1860.)

Decree affirmed, with costs to the appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lane v. Fallen, 16 Md. 352, 1860 Md. LEXIS 72 (Md. 1860).

16 Md. 352 (Lane v. Fallen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Willson v. Williams
70 A. 409 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1908)
Spencer v. Almoney
56 Md. 551 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1881)