Lane v. Fallen

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Lane v. Fallen

16 Md. 352, 1860 Md. LEXIS 72

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJuly 11, 1860

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 16 Md. 352 (Lane v. Fallen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lane v. Fallen, 16 Md. 352, 1860 Md. LEXIS 72 (Md. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Eccleston, J.,

delivered the opinion of this court.

The clepree appealed from dismissed the bill, upon the [357]*357ground, that the judgment presented in defence is a proper set-off against the claim of the complainants. Believing, as we do, that the circumstances disclosed by the record are ¡sufficient to sustain the decision below, the decree will be affirmed. See Smith & Talbott vs. Donnell, 9 Gill, 89. Ferris, et al., vs. Burton, 1 Vermont Rep., 439, 455.

(Decided July 11th, 1860.)

Decree affirmed, with costs to the appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eccleston, J.,

delivered the opinion of this court.

The clepree appealed from dismissed the bill, upon the [357]*357ground, that the judgment presented in defence is a proper set-off against the claim of the complainants. Believing, as we do, that the circumstances disclosed by the record are ¡sufficient to sustain the decision below, the decree will be affirmed. See Smith & Talbott vs. Donnell, 9 Gill, 89. Ferris, et al., vs. Burton, 1 Vermont Rep., 439, 455.

(Decided July 11th, 1860.)

Decree affirmed, with costs to the appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Md. 352, 1860 Md. LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-fallen-md-1860.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack