Lane v. Eckert

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lane v. Eckert

652 So. 2d 1257, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3555, 1995 WL 150422

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 7, 1995

DocketNo. 93-00677

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 652 So. 2d 1257 (Lane v. Eckert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lane v. Eckert, 652 So. 2d 1257, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3555, 1995 WL 150422 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

QUINCE, Judge.

Because the appellant failed to comply with the requirements of section 768.28(6), Florida Statutes (1991), the trial court properly dismissed his complaint. Since, however, the statute of limitations had not yet run at the time of dismissal, the appellant shall have the opportunity to file an amended complaint after compliance with the statute. Wright v. Polk County Public Health Unit, 601 So.2d 1318 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Hamide v. State, Dep’t of Corrections, 548 So.2d 877 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Wemett v. Duval County, 485 So.2d 892 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We therefore affirm the dismissal of the complaint and remand for further proceedings.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

QUINCE, Judge.

Because the appellant failed to comply with the requirements of section 768.28(6), Florida Statutes (1991), the trial court properly dismissed his complaint. Since, however, the statute of limitations had not yet run at the time of dismissal, the appellant shall have the opportunity to file an amended complaint after compliance with the statute. Wright v. Polk County Public Health Unit, 601 So.2d 1318 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Hamide v. State, Dep’t of Corrections, 548 So.2d 877 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Wemett v. Duval County, 485 So.2d 892 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We therefore affirm the dismissal of the complaint and remand for further proceedings.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

652 So. 2d 1257, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3555, 1995 WL 150422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-eckert-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack