Lane v. Cook

3 Day 255
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
DecidedJune 15, 1808
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 3 Day 255 (Lane v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lane v. Cook, 3 Day 255 (circtdct 1808).

Opinion

By the Couht.

It appears by the record of the city court, that Lane, the defendant in that action, and plaintiff in this, appeared in the court to defend, and pleaded that he owed the plaintiff nothing by book, but that the plaintiff owed him. The necessary legal inference, there, fore, is, that his book account was then submitted to the consideration and decision of that court. And the judgment states, that the court fully heard the parties in the premises; found that the defendant did owe ; and thereupon did consider, &c.

This appearance and plea of Lane, and the judgment 0£ .the city court in that action, are conclusive upon the parties thereto, as to all matters on book subsisting between them at the date of the writ, on which that judgment was rendered. The evidence offered by the plaintiff, 'before the superior court, was, therefore, properly rejected.

New trial not to be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vierling v. Leich
64 N.E. 230 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1902)
Burritt v. Belfy
47 Conn. 323 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1879)
Oliver v. Holt
11 Ala. 574 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1847)
Bendernagle v. Cocks
19 Wend. 207 (New York Supreme Court, 1838)
Avery v. Fitch
4 Conn. 362 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1822)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Day 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-cook-circtdct-1808.