Lane v. City of New York

274 A.D.2d 417, 711 N.Y.S.2d 782, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7732
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 10, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated July 26, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs’ decedent was allegedly injured when he [418] tripped and fell on a defective sidewalk. The most current map of the subject location, prepared by the “Big Apple Pothole & Sidewalk Protection Corp.”, and filed with the City of New York approximately seven months before the accident, did not contain the defect alleged by the plaintiffs in the area in question. Accordingly, as the City had no prior written notice of the complained of defect, the action against it was properly dismissed (see, Katz v City of New York, 87 NY2d 241; Welsh v City of New York, 258 AD2d 647; Dallal v City of New York, 257 AD2d 354; Halali v City of New York, 253 AD2d 849; Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-201 [c] [2]). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lane v. City of New York, 274 A.D.2d 417, 711 N.Y.S.2d 782, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7732 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

274 A.D.2d 417 (Lane v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carvajal v. City of New York
7 Misc. 3d 509 (New York Supreme Court, 2005)