Lane v. Chantilly Corp.
225 A.D. 789
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.; Dowling, P. J., and Finch, J., dissent on the authority of McCarter v. Crawford (245 N. Y. 43).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lane v. Chantilly Corp., 225 A.D. 789 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
225 A.D. 789 (Lane v. Chantilly Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCarter v. Crawford
156 N.E. 90 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)