Lane v. Brown.

Superior Court of North Carolina

Lane v. Brown.

3 N.C. 215

DecidedJuly 5, 1802

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 215 (Lane v. Brown.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lane v. Brown., 3 N.C. 215 (N.C. Ct. App. 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

TAYLOR, Judge.

Upon the dissolution of an injunction, it is of course to retain the money in the office, if affidavit be made, stating circumstances which render it doubtful .whether the same may be recovered out of the estate of the defendant, should the dectee be against him, unless, he will give security for its forthcoming on such an event.

Accordingly in this case an affidavit was made to that effect; and Taylor, after very many censures upon the drawer of the affidavit for its prolixity, ordered the money to be retained until security given.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TAYLOR, Judge.

Upon the dissolution of an injunction, it is of course to retain the money in the office, if affidavit be made, stating circumstances which render it doubtful .whether the same may be recovered out of the estate of the defendant, should the dectee be against him, unless, he will give security for its forthcoming on such an event.

Accordingly in this case an affidavit was made to that effect; and Taylor, after very many censures upon the drawer of the affidavit for its prolixity, ordered the money to be retained until security given.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.C. 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-brown-ncsuperct-1802.