Lane v. Baker
This text of 12 Ohio St. 237 (Lane v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case depends upon the same principles with that of Jeffries v. Ankeny et al., 11 Ohio, 372.
It is an action on the case against school directors, for refusing to admit the plaintiff’s child into the district school. The jury found, by special verdict, that the youth, whose admission to school was forbidden, “ was of negro, Indian and white blood, but of more than half white blood.” The question is reserved, to determine if the plaintiff may take judgment on these facts.
A majority of the court find no cause to change the opinion they expressed in the case cited, in which they followed former decisions. Polly Gray v. The State, 4 Ohio, 353 ; Williamson v. The School Directors, Wright, 578 ; Jeffries v. Ankeny, 11 Ohio, 372 ; Thacker v. Hawk and others, Ibid. 376.
Judgment for plaintiff on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 Ohio St. 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-baker-ohio-1843.