Lane Realty Co. v. Fox

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lane Realty Co. v. Fox

23 Misc. 2d 892, 206 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3697

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 23 Misc. 2d 892 (Lane Realty Co. v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lane Realty Co. v. Fox, 23 Misc. 2d 892, 206 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this action for brokerage commissions, it was error to exclude parol evidence to show that the binder agreement was conditional (N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinley, 246 N. Y. 40).

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts and a new trial granted, with $30 costs to the defendants to abide the event.

Concur — Hart, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI