Lane, Brendalyn v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 4, 2005
• Docket: 14-04-01023-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 4, 2005

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 4, 2005.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-04-01023-CR

NO. 14-04-01024-CR

NO. 14-04-01025-CR

BRENDALYN LANE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 990,004; 990,005; & 990,376

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a plea of no contest to the offenses of injury to a child; injury to a child, and aggravated robbery.  After a pre-sentence investigation and a hearing, the trial court assessed punishment at ten years=, ten years=, and forty years= confinement.  Appellant filed a written notice of appeal. 

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record, which she received on May 6, 2005.  No pro se response has been filed.

We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the State.

Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed August 4, 2005.

Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Seymore, and Guzman.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).