LandZone, Inc. v. Todd L. Keaton and Beth A. Keaton

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 21, 2021·No. 13-20-00307-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-20-00307-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

LANDZONE, INC., Appellant,

v.

TODD L. KEATON AND BETH A. KEATON, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 25th District Court of Lavaca County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

This cause is before the Court on a joint agreement to dismiss which is hereby

construed as a motion to dismiss. The parties have reached an agreement and request

that the appeal be dismissed as part of the settlement. The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to

dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).

The joint motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs

are taxed against the appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the

parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal,

appellant’s motion for mandamus review that was previously carried is now DISMISSED

as moot.

DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice

Delivered and filed on the 21st day of January, 2021.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LandZone, Inc. v. Todd L. Keaton and Beth A. Keaton, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

LandZone, Inc. v. Todd L. Keaton and Beth A. Keaton (LandZone, Inc. v. Todd L. Keaton and Beth A. Keaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.