Landy v. Landy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Landy v. Landy

281 A.D. 909, 120 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3746

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 30, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D. 909 (Landy v. Landy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Landy v. Landy, 281 A.D. 909, 120 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a consolidated action for dissolution of a partnership and an accounting, and to recover chattels, the parties being husband and wife, the husband appeals from two orders. The first order, entered on February 16, 1953, denied his motion lo compel the wife to discontinue her cause, for dissolution of the partnership and for an accounting, or in the alternative to stay the action pending entry of a decree of divorce in an action brought by the husband in Florida. The second order, entered on March 5, 1953, denied his motion for reargument, or in the alternative for a stay of trial pending determination of his appeal from the first order. Orders affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a consolidated action for dissolution of a partnership and an accounting, and to recover chattels, the parties being husband and wife, the husband appeals from two orders. The first order, entered on February 16, 1953, denied his motion lo compel the wife to discontinue her cause, for dissolution of the partnership and for an accounting, or in the alternative to stay the action pending entry of a decree of divorce in an action brought by the husband in Florida. The second order, entered on March 5, 1953, denied his motion for reargument, or in the alternative for a stay of trial pending determination of his appeal from the first order. Orders affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 909, 120 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landy-v-landy-nyappdiv-1953.