Landy v. Hamilton
This text of 69 A. 1121 (Landy v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff, a child eight and a half years old, started to cross the street, not at a public crossing, and met a wagon, which drew up to let her pass, and immediately beyond she was struck by the defendant’s wagon, going in the same direction. There was no evidence of defendant’s negligence except the child’s expression that the horse flew past “like a bird. ” It would be unsafe to base a verdict on anything so indefinite.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 A. 1121, 221 Pa. 50, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landy-v-hamilton-pa-1908.