Landsman v. Schutzman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Landsman v. Schutzman

29 A.D.2d 932, 289 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4233

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 932 (Landsman v. Schutzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Landsman v. Schutzman, 29 A.D.2d 932, 289 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4233 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered November 21,1967, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting from the fifth ordering paragraph, subdivision 3, the sum of $2,250 and substituting in lieu thereof the sum of $1,250, and, as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Considering the nature and extent of the services rendered by the guardian ad litem and the fact that the adjudica[933]*933tian hearing was short and uncomplicated, the allowance to the guardian was excessive and unreasonable and reduction to $1,250 is warranted. (Matter of Berman, 21 A D 2d 136; Matter of Mayer, 19 A D 2d 885; Matter of Burk, 6 A D 2d 429.) Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, McGivern and Rabin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered November 21,1967, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting from the fifth ordering paragraph, subdivision 3, the sum of $2,250 and substituting in lieu thereof the sum of $1,250, and, as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Considering the nature and extent of the services rendered by the guardian ad litem and the fact that the adjudica[933]*933tian hearing was short and uncomplicated, the allowance to the guardian was excessive and unreasonable and reduction to $1,250 is warranted. (Matter of Berman, 21 A D 2d 136; Matter of Mayer, 19 A D 2d 885; Matter of Burk, 6 A D 2d 429.) Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, McGivern and Rabin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 932, 289 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landsman-v-schutzman-nyappdiv-1968.