Landry v. US Airways, Inc.

571 S.E.2d 586

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Landry v. US Airways, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 356 N.C. 419 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 22, 2002·No. 278A02·Published

Opinion

571 S.E.2d 586 (2002)

Douglas Jeffrey LANDRY, Employee,
v.
US AIRWAYS, INC., Employer, RSKCO, Carrier.

No. 278A02.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 22, 2002.

Law Offices of George W. Lennon, by George W. Lennon and Michael W. Ballance, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellee.

*587 Brooks, Stevens & Pope, P.A., by Michael C. Sigmon and Matthew P. Blake, Cary, for defendant-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

571 S.E.2d 586 (2002)

Douglas Jeffrey LANDRY, Employee,
v.
US AIRWAYS, INC., Employer, RSKCO, Carrier.

No. 278A02.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 22, 2002.

Law Offices of George W. Lennon, by George W. Lennon and Michael W. Ballance, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellee.

*587 Brooks, Stevens & Pope, P.A., by Michael C. Sigmon and Matthew P. Blake, Cary, for defendant-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.

Landry v. US Airways, Inc., 571 S.E.2d 586 (N.C. 2002).

Pincite

571 S.E.2d 586 (Landry v. US Airways, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.