Landry v. Singley
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION BRYAN WAYNE LANDRY CIVIL ACTION NO. 25-0780 SECTION P VS. JUDGE JERRY EDWARDS, JR. MICHAEL SINGLEY, ET AL. MAG. JUDGE KAYLA D. MCCLUSKY
JUDGMENT The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered (Doc. 6), together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court (Doc. 7), and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff Bryan Wayne Landry's false arrest and unlawful search claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, as legally frivolous and for failure to state claims on which relief may be granted, until the Heck conditions are met. See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's remaining claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as untimely, legally frivolous, and for failing to state claims on which relief may be granted. ALEXANDRIA, LOUISIANA, this 17th day of July, 2025.
Lobarerale, Qn, JERRYEDWA. JR. UNISD STATES*DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Landry v. Singley (Landry v. Singley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.