Landry v. Poirrier

66 So. 163, 135 La. 731, 1914 La. LEXIS 1837
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 29, 1914·No. No. 20655·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

MONROE, C. J.

The usual order having been made for the review of the judgment rendered in the above-entitled suit, and the record having been forwarded to this court, the plaintiffs now appear and move that the order be recalled and this proceeding dismissed for the reason that the application was not verified by affidavit, as required by law, and that the order was therefore improvidently granted. The fact being as stated, the motion must be sustained. Constitution, art. 101; Act 191 of 1898, § 2; Landry & Son v. Labarre et al., 125 La. 714, 51 South. 697; Coignet v. Nelson, 128 La. 420, 54 South. 925. The order heretofore made in this case is therefore recalled and rescinded, and this proceeding is dismissed, at the cost of the applicant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Landry v. Poirrier, 66 So. 163, 135 La. 731, 1914 La. LEXIS 1837 (La. 1914).

66 So. 163 (Landry v. Poirrier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wischer v. Madison Realty Company
136 So. 2d 62 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1961)
Jackson v. Petrie & McFarland
138 So. 113 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1931)
Haas v. Opelousas-St. Landry Bank & Trust Co.
119 So. 700 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)
Horvath v. Eppling
113 So. 778 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
Tircuit v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co.
110 So. 489 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1926)
Landry v. Poirier
11 Teiss. 194 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1914)