Landry v. Broussard
This text of 108 So. 3d 760 (Landry v. Broussard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Broussard M.D., Emile et al.; Emile D. Broussard, A Professional Medical Corporation; Young Eye Clinic, A Professional Medical Corporation; — Defendants); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Vermilion, 15th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 93129; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 12-00617.
Granted in part. In the absence of any indication defendants’ writ application was frivolous, the court of appeal, erred in awarding plaintiff attorney fees. See Hampton v. Greenfield, 618 So.2d 859 (La.1993). Accordingly, the award of attorney fees is reversed. In all other respects, the application is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 So. 3d 760, 2013 WL 718800, 2013 La. LEXIS 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landry-v-broussard-la-2013.