Landrum v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Landrum v. State

122 S.W.2d 633

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 21, 1938

DocketNo. 20042

StatusPublished

This text of 122 S.W.2d 633 (Landrum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Landrum v. State, 122 S.W.2d 633 (Tex. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for chicken theft; punishment is asesssed at a fine of $50.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and all procedural matters seem to be in due order.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by' the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for chicken theft; punishment is asesssed at a fine of $50.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and all procedural matters seem to be in due order.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by' the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 S.W.2d 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landrum-v-state-texcrimapp-1938.