Landrum v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Landrum v. State

375 S.W.3d 262, 2012 WL 3667998, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1037

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 28, 2012·No. No. ED 97725·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrish Landrum appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion [263] for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrish Landrum appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion [263] for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Landrum v. State, 375 S.W.3d 262, 2012 WL 3667998, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1037 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

375 S.W.3d 262 (Landrum v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.