Landrum v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Landrum v. State

139 S.E. 129, 37 Ga. App. 120, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 511

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 14, 1927

Docket18188

StatusPublished

This text of 139 S.E. 129 (Landrum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Landrum v. State, 139 S.E. 129, 37 Ga. App. 120, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 511 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. The single special ground of the motion for a new trial (complaining of an excerpt from the charge of the court) shows no error.

2. Under all the facts of the case this court can not hold that there was no evidence authorizing the verdict; and, the finding of the jury having [121]*121been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere with the verdict.

Decided July 14, 1927. Thomas G. Lewis, 0. C. Hancock, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeOraw, John H. Hudson, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI