Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Landrum v. Middaugh

Landrum v. Middaugh

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 12
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Landrum v. Middaugh. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 Ohio St. 608 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 28, 1927·No. No. 20445·Published

Opinion

ALLEN, J.

An employe who has applied for and accepted compensation for an injury received in the course of his employment through the negligent act of his foreman, performed in the regular course of such foreman’s employment while both the employe and his foreman were working for an employer who had complied with th° pi ovisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, cannot thereafter maintain an action against his foreman to recover damages for his injury.

(Marshall, CJ., Day, Robinson and Matthias, JJ., concur.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Landrum v. Middaugh, 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 12 (Ohio 1927).

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 12 (Landrum v. Middaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.