Landrigan v. Schriro

501 F.3d 1147, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 21063, 2007 WL 2473136
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 4, 2007·No. 00-99011·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The mandate, issued on May 8, 2006, is recalled. In light of the Supreme Court’s mandate, issued on July 30, 2007, in Schriro v. Landrigan, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1933, 167 L.Ed.2d 836 (2007), we vacate our en banc decision, Landrigan v. Schriro, 441 F.3d 638 (9th Cir.2006), and affirm the district court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing on Landrigan’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We again adopt the three-judge panel’s holdings with respect to the additional sentencing issues raised on appeal, Landrigan v. Stewart, 272 F.3d 1221, 1229-31 (9th Cir.2001). Therefore, the district court’s denial of Landrigan’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Landrigan v. Schriro, 501 F.3d 1147, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 21063, 2007 WL 2473136 (9th Cir. 2007).

501 F.3d 1147 (Landrigan v. Schriro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

(DP) Cowan v. Cates
E.D. California, 2022
Christopher Spreitz v. Charles Ryan
916 F.3d 1262 (Ninth Circuit, 2019)
Charles Hedlund v. Charles Ryan
750 F.3d 793 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)