Landrigan v. Schriro
This text of 501 F.3d 1147 (Landrigan v. Schriro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The mandate, issued on May 8, 2006, is recalled. In light of the Supreme Court’s mandate, issued on July 30, 2007, in Schriro v. Landrigan, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1933, 167 L.Ed.2d 836 (2007), we vacate our en banc decision, Landrigan v. Schriro, 441 F.3d 638 (9th Cir.2006), and affirm the district court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing on Landrigan’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We again adopt the three-judge panel’s holdings with respect to the additional sentencing issues raised on appeal, Landrigan v. Stewart, 272 F.3d 1221, 1229-31 (9th Cir.2001). Therefore, the district court’s denial of Landrigan’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
501 F.3d 1147, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 21063, 2007 WL 2473136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landrigan-v-schriro-ca9-2007.