Landreth Timber Company v. Landreth
This text of 766 F.2d 1368 (Landreth Timber Company v. Landreth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
LANDRETH TIMBER COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ivan K. LANDRETH and Lucille Landreth, Husband and Wife;
Thomas E. Landreth, Ivan K. Landreth, Jr., and
Kathleen Landreth, Husband and Wife,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 81-3446.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
July 24, 1985.
Malcolm L. Edwards, Edwards & Barbieri, Seattle, Wash., Jacob H. Stillman, Atty. S.E.C., Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant.
James A. Smith, Jr., Bogle & Gates, Seattle, Wash., for defendants-appellees.
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, TUTTLE* and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
In accordance with the mandate of the Supreme Court in Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth, et al., --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 2297, 85 L.Ed.2d 692 (1985), the judgment of the district court is REVERSED and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
Honorable Elbert Parr Tuttle, Senior Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
766 F.2d 1368, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landreth-timber-company-v-landreth-ca9-1985.