Landreneau, Paul Arron
This text of Landreneau, Paul Arron (Landreneau, Paul Arron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-83,531-01
EX PARTE PAUL ARRON LANDRENEAU, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1400711-A IN THE 184TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a
controlled substance with the intent to deliver and sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment. He did
not appeal his conviction.
Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary because a post-guilty
plea laboratory report found no controlled substances in the seized evidence. The trial court adopted
Applicant’s and the State’s proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that 2
we grant relief. The trial court found that the laboratory analysis in Applicant’s case did not indicate
the presence of any controlled substance or dangerous drug. According to the report forwarded with
the record, however, 26.71 grams of methamphetamine were found.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Mable, 443
S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App.
1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334
S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact.
The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
Applicant appears to be represented by counsel. If he is not and the trial court elects to hold
a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to
be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing.
TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make further findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the
26.71 grams of methamphetamine mentioned in the laboratory report were the basis for Applicant’s
conviction in cause number 1400711. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and
conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for
habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall 3
be obtained from this Court.
Filed: September 16, 2015 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Landreneau, Paul Arron, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landreneau-paul-arron-texcrimapp-2015.