Landon v. Lane County

675 P.2d 516, 66 Or. App. 756, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2737
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 1, 1984
Docket16-80-11713; CA A27649
StatusPublished

This text of 675 P.2d 516 (Landon v. Lane County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Landon v. Lane County, 675 P.2d 516, 66 Or. App. 756, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2737 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is an action for fraud and negligence against Lane County and one of its employes. Plaintiffs appeal from a directed verdict on all counts of plaintiffs’ complaint. We dismiss the appeal.

When this action was originally brought, plaintiffs named as defendants — in addition to Lane County and Jack Thomas — one Gerald K. Dalros and one Estella Meyers. Dalros subsequently obtained an order of summary judgment, but our review of the record discloses no final judgment as to plaintiffs’ claims against him. See ORCP 67A. An order cannot take the place of a judgment or decree. See ORCP 70A; City of Portland v. Carriage Inn, 296 Or 191, 673 P2d 531 (1983). Moreover, although defendant Meyers no longer appears in the body of plaintiffs’ amended complaint, there is no final judgment disposing of plaintiffs’ claims against her.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Portland v. Carriage Inn
673 P.2d 531 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 P.2d 516, 66 Or. App. 756, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/landon-v-lane-county-orctapp-1984.